Engagement

Transaction Monitoring Controls Review

We sample alerts, re-perform rule logic against known scenarios, and assess whether case notes would stand up in a supervisory file review.

Request this audit
Analyst examining charts and reports at a workspace

Who this is for

Compliance teams at payment and lending fintechs whose monitoring rules have grown faster than documentation, or who received informal feedback after a thematic review.

What is included

  • Inventory of active monitoring scenarios and thresholds
  • Sample of closed and open alerts across risk categories
  • Re-performance of selected rules against synthetic and historical cases
  • Assessment of escalation paths and quality of case narratives
  • Recommendations on calibration, training, and backlog governance

Outside this scope

  • Building or hosting a monitoring application
  • Full forensic investigation of suspected crime
  • Formal suspicious transaction report filing on your behalf

How the engagement runs

  1. 1

    Rule inventory

    We catalogue scenarios, owners, last calibration dates, and known false-positive rates.

  2. 2

    Sample testing

    A risk-based sample of alerts is re-worked against your playbooks to test consistency and completeness.

  3. 3

    Calibration briefing

    Findings are presented with practical threshold and documentation changes your team can own.

Duration

2–3 weeks for a mid-sized alert volume.

Delivery

Primarily remote evidence review with optional on-site workshops in Pingtung County or Taipei by arrangement.

Preparation

Export alert extracts with redacted PII where needed, and provide current playbooks and escalation matrices.

Fees

From NT$180,000; higher for multi-product rule books.

Outcome: Documented strengths and weaknesses in monitoring coverage, with a short list of rule and process changes supervisors typically expect to see addressed.

Schedule a scoping call