Client stories

What remained after the memo landed

These notes come from compliance and finance leads who commissioned audits for fintech control environments — readiness, CDD sampling, monitoring, and diligence packs.

“The readiness memo forced us to date every open AML finding before our counsel opened the data room. That alone saved a week of awkward emails.”

Compliance lead, licensed payment institution — Taipei · Regulatory readiness audit

“Their CDD sample was tougher on our SME files than I expected. A few beneficial ownership trails we thought were fine did not survive the scoring sheet. The coaching session afterward was more useful than the scorecard.”

Head of onboarding, consumer lending fintech — Kaohsiung · CDD file audit

“We had rewritten monitoring thresholds three times in a year and never updated the playbook. Wei-Han’s inventory made that embarrassing — in a productive way. Two rules still need owners; we are sorting that before the next thematic visit.”

MLRO, e-money issuer — Taichung · Transaction monitoring controls review

“The diligence pack workshop was shorter than our previous consultant’s slide marathon. Counsel still asked hard questions, but we were not inventing answers about incident logs on the call.”

CFO, securities-related fintech — Taipei · Investor diligence controls pack

Extended story

Licensing file, eight weeks out

A payment institution approaching a licence variation asked for a regulatory readiness audit with a hard board date. Evidence intake showed three overlapping AML policy versions and an undated remediation list from a prior internal review.

Fieldwork sampled onboarding files, reconciliation packs, and two monitoring scenarios. The graded memo listed twelve findings; four were graded high, mostly around policy version control and overdue enhanced due diligence refreshes. The closing brief gave the compliance officer a calendar the board could approve the following week.

Leadership later noted that the calendar, not the length of the memo, was what their FSC correspondence ultimately referenced.

Extended story

Diligence room before a Series B

A lending fintech’s counsel asked for an independent challenge of the controls appendix two weeks before first-round meetings. The folder looked complete but buried open monitoring backlog metrics without explanation.

Our investor diligence engagement rebuilt the metrics page with caveats, ran a half-day Q&A dry run, and flagged three documents that still carried draft watermarks. Founders reported that subsequent investor questions stayed on product and unit economics rather than circling back to unexplained alert drops.

Commission a similar engagement

Tell us the milestone and timing. We will propose the engagement that fits — readiness or a focused control review.

Request an audit